Showing posts with label john carpenter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john carpenter. Show all posts

September 05, 2014

Yes, This CARVER Trailer Was Made By A 13 Year Old Girl


A few years ago I learned about Emily Hagins, a budding filmmaker who shot her first feature, Pathogen, at the age of 12.  It's a damn fine little zombie flick considering that the director was still in the midst of puberty.  She followed that up with My Sucky Teen Romance and later this month her Halloween set coming of age story Grow Up Tony Phillips will be released.  Hagins is both skilled and ambitious, so I look forward to watching all of her future films.

But she's not the only adolescent filmmaker named Emily out there.  Emily DiPrimio launched a Kickstarter campaign at the age of 13 to fund Carver, a love letter to the classic slasher films of yesteryear.  You've got to respect a teenager who chooses to emulate John Carpenter over Paranormal Activity, so I was happy to donate some funds to her project.  Now we've got the film's first trailer (courtesy of the fine folks at Badass Digest) and it's pretty great!


The acting is usually the weak point when it comes to these kinds of projects, but it's hardly terrible to the point of distraction.  Most importantly you've got a strong backstory, child murder, an iconic villain, and was that a crane shot?

I can't wait to see this thing when it's done.



October 25, 2013

FRIDAY THE 13TH Is Not The Movie I Thought It Was

"But...then he's still out there."
Did you know that Jason Voorhees, the infamous hockey masked and machete wielding killer from the Friday The 13th franchise is not actually in the original Friday The 13th?

Because I sure as fuck didn't.

I've been waiting until the final days before Halloween to dive into some of the more storied horror franchises that, much like their deranged antagonists, simply refuse to die no matter how many subpar sequels get made.  I've always considered Jason, Freddy and Michael Myers to be the "big three" when it comes to psychotic eternal killers and, while I've seen a few of the Halloween movies over the years, I've somehow managed to almost completely avoid Freddy and Jason.  In fact, my only real experience with these two iconic characters is the fairly disappointing Freddy Vs Jason and the hilariously over-the-top Jason X, or as I call it, "Jason Goes To Space."  That one's worth watching for the holodeck/sleeping bag scene alone.

It's probably telling that the only Jason movie I've ever seen is the one on a space ship.  I never really got into horror as a genre when I was a kid, erring more on the side of sci-fi instead.  Of course the two are incredibly intertwined, and a lot of horror movies draw heavily from sci-fi roots.  But even something like John Carpenter's The Thing, which is a perfect blend of the two, didn't find its way in front of my eyeballs until very late in the game.  I know that my parents never really let me watch R rated movies and I didn't have any horror fanatic friends or older siblings to sneak this stuff to me when they weren't looking.  Then again, maybe I was just a total wuss as a kid.

Either way, I thought I had a pretty good read on the basics of Friday The 13th, but when I sat down to watch the 1980 original last night, I was thrown for a complete and total loop instead.  It's almost unfathomable that Jason X can trace its lineage all the way back to this quaint yet brutally effective slasher flick, in which the killer not only remains off camera for 90% of the movie, but is eventually revealed to be a character that hasn't even been seen or mentioned in any way.  There's a very oblique reference to a "boy drowning in '57" by Enos the truck driver at the very beginning, but that's it until Mrs. Voorhees shows up at the eleventh hour to explain away the entire movie, which up until that point was just a series of attractive teenagers getting killed off for no reason other than a very nonspecific curse.  Aside from a few disappointing off-camera deaths, most of the kills are really well executed (zing!) and the repeated use of the killer's POV is almost as creepy as the owner of Camp Crystal Lake himself, who I was pretty certain was gonna turn out to be a rapist.  My only real complaint is about the very end: the bit with the girl in the canoe is SO TOTALLY AWESOME that the cut away to the hospital feels like a huge letdown.  I appreciate that they didn't try to explain the previous moment away as a dream, but that makes the scene all the more unnecessary.  They should have quit while they were ahead.

Live-tweet bewilderment follows:













































































Friday The 13th was more than just a pleasant surprise.  It completely pulled the rug out from under me.  Now I want to go through the whole franchise, if only to figure out how they got from here to Uber-Jason.  The reality might be disappointing, but NOW I NEED TO KNOW.

PS: The original trailer is embedded below as always, but I'd urge you not to watch it if you've never seen the film.  (I realize that may not be a lot of you.)  The whole thing is essentially a list of kill scenes, and while it doesn't really include the money shots, it still feels like it gives away a lot.

---------------------------------------
Title: Friday The 13th
Director: Sean S. Cunningham
Starring: Adrienne King, Jeannine Taylor, Kevin Bacon, Robbi Morgan, Harry Crosby, Laurie Bartram, Mark Nelson, Betsy Palmer
Year Of Release: 1980
Viewing Method: Netflix DVD




October 14, 2013

Brattle Theatre Watch-A-Thon Day One - Let's Get Culty!


I’ve spent the last month or so raising money for the Brattle Theatre so I could take part in their Watch-A-Thon Weekend, two days of back to back cult and classic movies from noon midnight.  Thanks to some of you wonderful folks, I raised over $300 for the Brattle, which means my weekend was effectively booked.

I arrived Saturday at noon and received a lovely gift bag for participating, including a pass for unlimited popcorn and soda as well as some gift cards for local eateries meant to encourage me to venture out into the world between screenings.  Sadly these enticing culinary offers came just as I had re-embarked upon my pre-wedding diet meant to combat my ever expanding waistline.  As it turns out there was only one other person participating in the Watch-A-Thon with me, and it just so happened that while my preferred seating position was down in front, his was up in the balcony.  We settled into our respective seats and prepared for out cinematic adventure, kicked off with three shorts: Mr. Bean Attends A Premiere, Nick Park’s infamous claymation Creature Comforts and one of my personal favorites, Duck Dodgers From The 24th And A Half Century.  I hadn’t watched that in years and it was the perfect way to kick off the festivities.

"I've seen The Exorcist about 167 times and it keeps getting funnier EVERY SINGLE TIME I SEE IT!"
First up was Time Burton’s Beetlejuice, celebrating its 25th anniversary.  This is a movie I’ve seen a number of times, but it had actually been a while since my last viewing.  I forgot just how little Michael Keaton is actually in that movie; he’s so totally great you just assume the movie is wall-to-wall Keaton, but he's really used very sparingly and doesn't even fully appear until about halfway through.  I love the sheer banality of the afterlife’s civil servants, and Wynona Ryder is at her most adorably droll here.   At this point, watching stuff like Beetlejuice and Edwad Scissorhands depresses me more than anything else, since Tim Burton hasn’t made a movie this good in years.  At least not a live action one.

In the middle of the movie I suddenly remembered that I used to watch a Beetlejuice Saturday morning cartoon in which Beetlejuice was actually a good guy who got into weekly adventures with young Lydia.  That's a serious departure from the film where he’s a Loki-esque force of uncontrollable chaos.  Was Beetlejuice a big hit with kids when it was released?  It’s certainly not a family film but I can see the wacky appeal to kids.  It’s like the Ghostbusters cartoon, where Slimer was suddenly their lovable pet.   So weird.

"Smells mighty like a polecat!"
Speaking of weird.  Tiny Town is a 1938 musical western starring all midgets (their word, not mine). 

AND IT’S AWESOME.

Here’s the thing about Tiny Town.   While the actors are small of stature, they’re all clearly adults, with some of them sporting wrinkled, craggy faces that have seen some serious mileage.  But even still, most of the cast has fairly high pitched voices, so when they’re not in close-up it gives the visual impression that you’re watching children playing cowboy.  That’s all well and good I suppose, that is until we get to the scene with a sexy saloon singer crooning a tune about “when I make love to you.”  Then it gets super creepy, super quickly.  

That sense of proportional disconnect is amplified by the fact that, while everyone in the film is small, everything in the town is normal sized.  The saloon is particularly entertaining: there’s a big step in off the street that’s so high that one character has to use his arms to literally hoist himself up, the swinging saloon doors hang far enough over their heads that the cowboys can practically duck under them, and the bar is so tall that they had to build a platform for the actors to stand on.  In reality this is a budgetary matter; the studio surely had a stock “old west” set that they shot the film on to save money.  But within the context of the film it makes no logical sense at all.  If this was a town consisting entirely of little people then they surely would have built everything according to their own specifications.  So what’s the deal?  Did these little people take over a normal sized town?  Did the buildings come ready-made in some kind of Old West kit?  Are there bigger people elsewhere that we just don’t see, or is this movie set in a universe of entirely little people?  If that’s true then why is everything so damn big?  It’s the same problem I have with Pixar’s Cars, in which the cars are clearly alive and yet their world is clearly constructed for human beings that are never seen or discussed.  Is Cars secretly post-apocalyptic?  Did the cars evolve and overthrow their creators?  I NEED TO KNOW.

"Kill!  Kill!"
A classic Shaw Brothers kung-fu film about a clan of seven brothers, simply named No. 1 through 7, all masters of the long-poled spear who are betrayed in battle.  All but two are killed, and while No. 6 returns home completely unhinged, No. 5 immediately goes into hiding at a Buddhist temple.  He’s determined to renounce his name and his violent past in order to become a monk, but the order won’t have him.  They refuse to shave his head and brand the traditional six dots onto his scalp, so in a moment of fierce determination he takes a knife, dry-shaves his own head and then brands himself.  The monks allow him to stay and he demonstrates his skill at pole fighting, the monk’s kung-fu of choice.  They practice against wooden wolves with metal teeth, but rather than destroying the wolves they practice defanging them.  This sets up the final scene in which No. 5, after learning that his sister (No. 8) is being held captive by the man who betrayed his family, takes on an entire army using only his spear and a cart full of bamboo poles.  And just when he gets cornered and all looks lost, his fellow monks show up and proceed to literally defang the enemy soldiers, ripping their teeth straight out of their jaws.

It’s super entertaining and full of absolutely gorgeous production design.  And the fight scenes are all totally great, a mix of both the hilariously exaggerated and the legitimately kickass.  The enemy soldiers are armed with staffs with specially designed coiled ends that act like bungee cords (although they look kind of like bendy straws) that can wrap around spears and limbs alike to immobilize and disarm their opponents.  It’s cartoon-level stuff but it totally works, providing the opportunity to have men suspended midair in any number of uncomfortable positions.  It’s also clearly a favorite of Tarantino, as the lead role is played by Gordon Liu and the villain’s name is Pan Mei, which sounds a lot like the kung-fu master Pai Me that Liu played in Kill Bill Vol. 2.  I’d never seen a proper Shaw Brothers film before and this made me want to watch a dozen more.

DINNER BREAK!

The next film was I, Monster, a Jeckyll and Hyde-esque story starring Christopher Lee, but I skipped it to meet the wife and some friends for dinner at Grendel’s Den, a German restaurant just around the corner from the theater.  It was Oktoberfest weekend in Cambridge, and Grendel’s is our favorite place to celebrate each year, as they’ve got great imported beer on tap and tasty brats all for super cheap.


"It's all in the reflexes."
I returned to the Brattle at 8:00 for my next movie, which was originally supposed to be Zardoz.  Fortunately for me it was replaced at the last minute; I don’t think I could have taken another viewing so soon after my last.  Instead I was treated to John Carpenter’s Big Trouble In Little China.  I had seen some bits and pieces of this over the years and I thought I had a pretty good handle on what the film was all about.  Kurt Russell as a truck driver who gets mixed up with some Chinese gangsters?  Sounds good to me!

I was WAY off.

How did I not realize this was a movie about ancient Chinese magic?  Talk about a game changer!  And Carpenter doesn’t do anything half-assed.  Not only are there ancient sorcerers, but there’s a floating eyeball creature and even a sort of giant Wookie demon.  Throw in Kim Catrall at the peak of her hotness and Kurt Russell doing a crazy John Wayne impression and the whole thing becomes a big ball of crazy in the greatest way possible.  I mean, wow.  This thing is paced breathlessly, like Carpenter was so anxious to get from one batshit crazy set-piece to the next that he didn't have time to stop and try to connect any of the dots.  I feel like the whole movie can be summed up in this single exchange:


Jack Burton: What's in the flask, Egg? Magic potion?
Egg Shen: Yeah.
Jack Burton: Thought so, good. What do we do, drink it?
Egg Shen: Yeah!
Jack Burton: Good! Thought so.

In other words, never let the plot get in the way of a good story.

I’m so grateful I got to see this in a theater with a vocal crowd, as I imagine that if I had been at home on my couch I would have just sat there in slack-jawed bewilderment wondering how I had gotten that movie so wrong for all these years.  So much fun.  I can’t wait to see what Russell does in the Fast & Furious movies.  Can I watch that right now please?

SECRET SCREENING!


All we were told about the final show was that it was a sci-fi classic and that, like Beetlejuice, it was celebrating its 25th anniversary.  I looked up what movies filled that description and came up with a list that included The Blob, Short Circuit 2, Mac And Me, Critters 2, Alien Nation, Killer Klowns From Outer Space, Earth Girls Are Easy and My Stepmom Is An Alien.  Any of those would have been just fine with me.  My money was actually on They Live, which would have made a for a fantastic Carpenter double feature, but it was actually the anime classic Akira.  I’ve been meaning to watch this movie for years, especially since I suspect I actually saw this once as a young child but I’ve never really been able to confirm it.  Sadly, I had stayed up very late the night before recording a new podcast, so my brain simply didn't have the ability to handle subtitles that late in the evening.  I drifted off about 30 minutes into the movie and by the time I came to I had no idea what the shit was going on anymore.  Oh well.  I'll have to watch this again some other time.

Coming Up: Watch-A-Thon Day 2 - UFOs!  Seuss Pianos!  WHERE'S THE FALCON?!?! 



October 05, 2013

Live-Tweeting TWIXT Leaves Me Hopeful For Coppola's Future

"What's your position on Daylight Savings time?"
Hollywood is a fickle beast.

There are a handful of legendary filmmakers, guys like John Carpenter, William Friedkin, Paul Schrader and yes, even Francis Ford Coppola who are simply unable to make studio pictures anymore.  As the old saying goes, "You're only as good as your last picture," and sadly most of these guys have been on the downslope for a while now, at least in terms of profitability.  (I will defend Friedkin's Killer Joe all the live long day.)  On the one hand it makes a certain kind of sense, but on the other it feels like a treacherous Catch-22, the kind of self-fulfilling prophecy that leaves talented filmmakers languishing in obscurity.  That's not to say these guys should be given some kind of lifetime immunity or that there's simply no chance their skills could have diminished over the years, but that doesn't make it any less painful to know that the guy who wrote Taxi Driver is now stuck making shit like The Canyons, starring Lindsay Lohan and a porn star.

Coppola in particular is an interesting example.  The guy has a filmography that reads like a must-watch list for any film lover.  Godfather I & II, The Conversation, Apocalypse Now, The Outsiders and oh yeah, the Disneyland 3D short Captain Eo starring Michael Jackson.  Sure his work from the 90's isn't exactly stellar; aside from Andy Garcia, Godfather III is an absolute pile of trash and the less said about Jack the better.   But then a remarkable thing happened.  Right at the turn of the millennium, Coppola took about a decade off from directing and busied himself as a producer.  He helped usher in ten years worth of provocative films, each one as varied and peculiar as the next.  Stuff like Kinsey, The Virgin Suicides, No Such Thing, Jeepers Creepers, CQ, Assasination Tango, Lost In Translation and The Good Shepherd all have Coppola's fingerprints on them in some way.  (Granted a number of those movies involve his various progeny, but they're all still solid films.)  And then, in 2007 Coppola suddenly returned to directing with three films in four years: Youth Without Youth, Tetro and Twixt.  Without warning, the man seemed to have regained the excitement of a film student, desperate to try weird new styles and techniques in order to prove his filmmaking chops.

Sadly Twixt often feels like a student film, with a narrative that's constantly running in circles and effects work that looks tragically cheap.  Coppola is shooting digital here and it's obvious that he struggles with the aesthetic. The lighting and the depth of field often feel off-kilter, like everyone's standing in front of green screens or possibly not even physically in the same room as each other.  (To be clear, there's definitely some heavy green screening here, but even the stuff that's on real sets somehow looks fake.)  Still, it's certainly never boring and you have to admire Coppola for being willing to dangle from the ledge of creativity and make some truly bizarre choices.  For example, when Twixt was first released he planned to take the show on a 30 city tour where his composer would score the film live while he actually tweaked the edit on the fly, riffing off audience reactions and creating a completely unique viewing experience every time.  Some scenes were meant to be shown in 3D as well, and Coppola is a guy who I really want to see utilizing a tool that can potentially be a game changer. (PrometheusHugo and Gravity all prove that 3D works best in the hands of master directors.)  He managed to pull off his live-edit concept in front of a half empty Hall H at Comic Con in 2011, but general audience reaction to the film was so negative that the road show plan simply evaporated.  That's a damn shame, as it sounds like a completely fascinating way to not only watch a movie, but to directly interact with the filmmaker's vision.  And with an innovator like Coppola at the wheel, that's an experience I would have paid virtually any price for, even with a film as underwhelming as Twixt.

Anyway, while Twixt is hardly a success, at least it's an interesting failure.  If nothing else, it's worth watching if only for the scene where Val Kilmer improvs opening lines for the novel he's writing.  At one point he even slips into his Brando impression.  It's pretty great.

Live-tweet ramblings below...


In a weird way, Twixt actually leaves me hopeful for future Coppola films. You'll never be able to convince me that we don't still need guys like him pushing the envelope of their own film vocabulary and trying new things in order to grow along with the medium. 

Rock on, Francis.  Rock on.

---------------------------------------
Title: Twixt
Director: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Val Kilmer, Elle Fanning, Bruce Dern, Ben Chaplin, Joanne Whalley, David Paymer, Anthony Fusco, Alden Ehrenreich
Year Of Release: 2011
Viewing Method: Redbox DVD





April 27, 2013

Live-Tweeting LOCKOUT Gives Me A Hankering For Snake

 

"I'm being beaten up by a guy called Rupert?"

John Carpenter's Escape From New York is seven different kinds of awesome.

Escape From L.A. is slightly less so.

While there have been some recent attempts to remake the franchise (the latest idea is beyond dumb), Carpenter used to talk about a potential third film, Escape From Earth.  Apparently Luc Besson heard that title and got tired of waiting around, so he wrote and produced Lockout instead.  The fact that the story is credited to "an original idea by Luc Besson" is an insult to plagiarism, as the plot can be boiled down thusly:

Escape From LAEscape From New York X Outer Space = Lockout

I'm really not embellishing.  Set in the future, the President's daughter is taken hostage when the inmates take over an orbital cryo-prison and only one man WHO'S A LOOSE CANNON can bust in to save her.  Guy Pearce plays Snow, our non-cycloptic Plissken stand in.  He's a little less gruff and a lot more wise-cracking, but he has a monosyllabic name that starts with "SN" so...close enough.

The set design is uninspired, the effects are serviceable at best (awful at worst), and the characters are downright uninspired.  We've got one villain who confuses menace with dullness and another who's basically a cartoon, while the guys monitoring the situation from Earth are all basically paint by numbers.  Peter Stormare does his Stormariest but isn't really given anything worthy of his talents.  The great Lennie James is similarly wasted as a skinnier version of Al Powell from Die Hard, another movie that Lockout borrows from liberally, (But then again who hasn't cribbed Die Hard at this point?) while Maggie Grace slightly classes up a role that, on paper, alternates between flat and annoying.  The only real winner here is Guy Pearce, who looks more alive in a movie than I've seen him in years.  He lands so many great one liners in the first fifteen minutes that I was willing to stick with him for the next seventy five.  That may have been a miscalculation on my part.

In the end, Lockout isn't really bad so much as it is disappointing.  The beginning is genuinely entertaining, yet it somehow pulls off the miracle of getting less fun when it goes into space.  The only thing that somewhat differentiates this from Carpenter's movies is a subplot about Snow's backstory and a government cover-up that slowly goes nowhere.  If Lockout felt like an homage, a tribute to a bygone era, that would be one thing.  Instead it just comes across like Besson wanted to remake Snake Plissken but couldn't get the rights, so he changed the title and the main character's name by three letters and called it a night.  Oh well.

We'll always have New York.

Live-tweet rantings follow below:

































Now if you'll excuse me, I think I'm gonna go find me some Plissken...

---------------------------------------
Title: Lockout
Director: James Mather, Stephen St. Leger
Starring: Guy Pearce, Maggie Grace, Peter Stormare, Lennie James, Vincent Regan, Joseph Gilgun
Year Of Release: 2012
Viewing Method: Netflix Instant (TV)