Showing posts with label hunger games. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hunger games. Show all posts

November 25, 2014

Podcast Episode 40: MOCKINGJAY PART 1 Kicks Off The Revolution


I couldn't help but walk out of Mockingjay: Part 1 feeling a bit disappointed.

The first Hunger Games movie left a real bad taste in my mouth, but Catching Fire actually kind of won me over with its liberal dose of sassy Jenna Malone and its promise of legit rebellion and the outright warfare to come.  That's the shit I was all excited to see in the first half of the final installment of this franchise.  Sadly I was let down on both fronts, with Malone sidelined off screen for all but five seconds of the movie and the rebellion whittled down to two and a half skirmishes spread out over two hours of screen time.  Those skirmishes are pretty cool in their own right, but I would have gladly taken more scenes of rebellion in the districts over Katniss staring pensively out over a brook.

There's plenty to like here, including Katniss's inability to perform in a propaganda video (I refuse to acknowledge this franchise's inane fixation with Suessian lingo), every word out of Elizabeth Banks' mouth, a well staged rescue operation, a horrific field of corpses and one last chance to enjoy Philip Seymour Hoffman.  But the biggest problem with Mockingjay: Part 1 is that it simply doesn't feel like a complete story.  We're not quite in Deathly Hallows* territory here, but everything that happens in this movie is merely the prologue to whatever's coming in Part 2.  It's enjoyable, but not exactly satisfying in its own right.  It reminds me of Episode 7 from any season of Game Of Thrones, one of those episodes that's more about moving the chess pieces into place so they can strike the killing blow later on down the road.

Bart and I talk to avowed Hunger Games fanatic Jamie about all this as well as her own wild-eyed theory that Peeta is secretly the boring version of Johanna. (I'm paraphrasing here.)  We also talk about the recent Peanuts trailer, the upcoming Star Wars trailer and casting rumors for both Jean Grey and Jessica Jones.


Next Week: Foxcatcher and/or Horrible Bosses 2


*Or, as I call it, Harry Potter And The Campsite Of Sadness





September 15, 2014

The New MOCKINGJAY PART 1 Trailer Looks Like A Movie I Might Finally Enjoy


I've always suspected that the best parts of the Hunger Games story would be found in the last installments and from the look of this trailer those suspicions seem to be correct.  We've finally moved past the pretense of the Games, which have only been marginally successful on screen, and now we're digging into an all out rebellion against the Empire.  Err, the Capitol


I feel like most people were pretty unhappy about the way things wrapped up when Mockingjay came out, but those are just the half-remembered whispers I overheard while I was busy not reading any of the books.  This certainly looks like the most cinematic of Katniss's adventures so far and I'd be lying if I said the idea of an authoritarian dictatorship and a plucky rebellion each pitting their own puppet warriors against each other didn't sound like fun.  I could go without the love triangle stuff, but what are you gonna do?  If nothing else, it's a chance to see a new Phillip Seymour Hoffman performance on the big screen and we don't have many more of those left to enjoy.

I expect to come home and find my wife watching this trailer on an infinite loop from now until November.

June 25, 2014

Here Is Your First MOCKINGJAY Teaser


Lots of people (particularly my wife) have some VERY strong feelings about The Hunger Games.  I am not one of those people.  The first film is fairly dull and seems to focus on all the least interesting stuff, and while Catching Fire was a significant improvement, I still find myself struggling to muster up any genuine excitement for this franchise.  I'll grant you that Katniss Everdeen is a total badass and Jennifer Lawrence does great work in the role.  Plus I'll support most anything that introduces the idea of creepy dystopian sci-fi to new audiences.  But at the end of the day it's hard to shake the feeling that it's really the love triangle melodrama that's driving a lot of the interest here, relegating the weird future stuff as mere window dressing.  It's like trying to argue that Twilight converted teenage girls into fans of non-sparkly vampire movies.

But whatever.  I'm not trying to slag Hunger Games or its fans.  (And it's certainly a huge step up from Twilight.)  I think it's just fine and I expect the franchise will only get better as it comes to a close.  I'll certainly be seeing Mockingjay Part 1 when it hits theaters this fall and I'll probably enjoy it, at which point I will promptly forget all about this franchise until Part 2 comes out a year later.

Anyway, here's a creepy teaser trailer for all you folks who are waiting for this film with baited breath.  You can even watch it in 4K, if you are appropriately equipped!


I say the more devious Donald Sutherland we get, the better.  But that's a good rule for life in general.



December 12, 2013

THE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE Improves The Franchise On Almost Every Level

"Remember who the enemy is."
My wife recently finished a master's degree in Children's Literature, so suffice it to say that YA fiction is totally her jam these days.  She LOOOOOOOOVES her some Hunger Games, having read all three books multiple times and watched her Blu-ray of the first movie more frequently than I can count.  I haven't read any of the books (it's doubtful that I ever will, simply by virtue of the fact that I don't have time to read a lot of books these days) and I think the first movie is kind of fine, but it certainly doesn't get me all hot and bothered.  It felt like that movie wasn't really interested in exploring any of the parts of its universe that seemed the most fascinating to me.  While Jamie has been waiting for Catching Fire with baited breath (and even took a bus to NY to see it with a friend) I've just been hoping the second installment would expand the world of Panem in a way that would make me give any kind of a shit.

Mission accomplished!

I am still not entirely won over, but now I'm at least interested in this franchise.  The thing is that I feel like I'm interested in all the wrong stuff, or at least none of the stuff they want me to like.  I fell instantly and madly in love with Jena Malone's punk rock warrior Johanna Mason, a former victor who's straight up PISSED to be back in the arena and she doesn't give a shit who knows it.  She's angry and funny and sexy and injects some sorely needed energy into a story full of largely morose characters.  Johanna is my favorite of the new crop of competitors, but in truth most of them are pretty great.  The "careers," aka the Abercrombie models who don't want a rebellion to spoil their cushy lives in the Capitol, continue to be virtual non-entities, a collection of beautiful faces for our heroes to kill off in a frustratingly bloodless fashion.  But Jeffrey Wright and Amanda Plummer are delightfully odd additions and I must admit that Sam Claflin brings a surprising level of complexity to Finnick Odair.  Phillip Seymour Hoffman's gamemaster Plutarch Heavensbee is a HUGE step up from Wes Bentley's Facial Hair, and while it's fun that they keep him at arm's length to make him more enigmatic, I really wanted to see more of him.  I'm glad that he'll be sticking around for at least one more film.  (Book three is split into two parts.)  Stanley Tucci remains fabulous with his blue hair and giant teeth, and Woody Harrelson continues to entertain as the mentor who's alcoholic but in a fun way.  Above all, I am totally in awe of Elizabeth Banks, who took her ridiculous, shrill clown of a character and imbued her with emotional depth and genuine soul.  After the last film I would have been happy to see her take the first bullet in the eventual revolution, but now I'm legitimately fond of Effie, who makes an adorable mother to the ragtag (quasi-incestuous) family from District 12.

I also found myself wondering more about the greater world of this dystopian future.  I know that the fictional nation of Panem is supposed to be located in North America (my understanding is that District 12 is somewhere in the Appalachians?) but what about the rest of the planet?  Is Panem the only remaining populated continent, or are there people in Europe and Asia that simply don't give a shit about what's happening across the ocean?  And how did Panem happen in the first place?  What happened to the good old US of A?  Is this the result of a nuclear war?  Ecological disaster?  Perhaps the incredible wealth/resource gap of Panem implies there was some kind of bloody civil war.  This stuff is often the most interesting part of a story set in a future with such a dramatically different status quo than the present, so of course I'm never going to get the answers to any of these questions.  Apparently Suzanne Collins was far more interested in coming up with a list of character names that feel like a Mad Libs compilation of the mispronunciations of a four year old.

I remain utterly ambivalent about the love triangle because, while Katniss is a badass, both of her male suitors are utterly boring.  And that's coming from someone who's been a big supporter of Josh Hutcherson since he was 13 years old.  But Peeta Mellark is lame sauce, pathetically pining away for the girl who doesn't want him and also apparently incapable of holding his own in a fight.  The amount of time he spends being critically injured, rescued and carried around like a sad sack of potatoes is bordering on laughable.  (According to Jamie it's even worse in the book - dude can't even swim.)  I've been assured that Peeta gets way better in the third installment, so here's hoping.  Liam Hemsworth doesn't fare much better as Gale, a character who feels like he's only had about ten scenes over the course of both movies.  At least he gets to take some kind of heroic action this time around (although his most heroic deed takes place entirely off screen) but Gale just isn't a fully developed enough character for me to invest any kind of emotion in him.  And while I like the idea of President Evil Donald Sutherland, in reality he spends the majority of his scenes simply sitting around watching TV screens while making menacing insinuations.  This may be intended to make him look like some kind of Machiavellian manipulator, but instead it feels like Sutherland had a rider in his contract stipulating that he would stay seated through 90% of his scenes.

On the flip side, Jennifer Lawrence continues to completely own this franchise.  I think they made Katniss a bit too wishy-washy this time around, miring her in a "refusal of the call" storyline that goes on far too long.  It's ends up being intrinsic to the film's final reveal in which we discover that Katniss has been purposely left out of the loop for some extremely important stuff, but I can't help thinking she would have been far more useful if she wasn't being kept in the dark.  It feels too much like a clunky attempt to adhere to a rigid story structure, as opposed to something that's organic and character driven.  But Lawrence is so strong in the role that most of those complaints don't really hit you until the drive home.  And, if the film's final shot is any indication, this whole movie essentially serves as Katniss's last attempt to play by the rules of the Capitol before fully embracing her role as hero of the rebellion, so they've got to push her patience to the limit before she swings back around to the other side.  Katniss Everdeen is the Luke Skywalker to a whole generation of young girls and that's something that can only have awesome results for the future.  It's great to see such a strong female role model that not only anchors this franchise, but elevates it practically through sheer force of Jennifer Lawrence's will.

This is easily director Francis Lawrence's best film, and I quite liked Constantine and the first two thirds of I Am Legend.  He brings some much needed scope to the world of Panem and directs the action with far greater confidence (and far less shaky cam) than previous director Gary Ross.  It surely helps that Lionsgate significantly pumped up the budget this time around and it absolutely shows on screen, as opposed to the Twilight movies that always looked like they were being shot in the producer's backyard even after they were killing it at the box office.  I was hoping that we'd get a bit more brutality in the arena this time around, especially considering how traumatic the games are to everyone who manages to survive.  (Haymitch is a drunk and Katniss definitely has PTSD.)  But the violence remains sadly restrained, as if they're afraid to alienate their target audience with the central plot device of the franchise.  Hopefully the next films won't continue to pull their punches when the story (hopefully) turns to all out war.

I'm now realizing that this piece comes off pretty negative, but I really did enjoy Catching Fire.  It's exciting purely on a surface level, but the story also managed to keep me guessing throughout; the big reveal at the end I did not see coming (except for the "shocking" part that happens off screen, which was very clearly telegraphed ten minutes into the movie) and once the games began, I was constantly trying to puzzle out the motivations of the various tributes in an effort to figure out who was trustworthy and who was not.  I've always suspected that this was a franchise I was going to enjoy more at the end than the beginning, and this is such a significant step up from the first entry that my theory feels vindicated.  

The Hunger Games is probably never going to be a franchise I get legitimately excited about, certainly not in the same way that my wife does.  But it's now officially been upgraded from "watchable" to "interesting," for whatever that's worth.

Bring on the revolution.


---------------------------------------
Title: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Director: Francis Lawrence
Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Sam Claflin, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Stanley Tucci, Lenny Kravitz, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Jena Malone, Jeffrey Wright
Year Of Release: 2013
Viewing Method: Theatrical - Jordans IMAX




November 21, 2013

ENDER'S GAME Should Have Been An HBO Series

"It matters how we win."
There's a pivotal scene in Ender's Game where the hero is attacked by an older boy while taking a shower.  In the book, Ender, ever the tactician, increases the water temperature to build up a cloud of steam and then lathers himself up with soap in order to prevent his assailant from getting a good grip on him.  It's a clever, quick-thinking maneuver on Ender's part.  In the film, we see Ender turn the shower knob and vacantly rub a bar of soap on his chest, but we never get the sense that these things have any bearing on the ensuing fight.  His actions are presented more as idle stage direction than character-based decisions, thus undercutting the value of his eventual victory.  That kind of sums up the whole movie right there.  At best, Gavin Hood's Ender's Game movie manages to perfectly replicate the experience of someone describing a book they read once in high school but now they only sort of remember it.  In other words, it captures all the broad strokes of the story but lacks any of the nuanced details.

Orson Scott Card may be a bigoted asshat, but his novel Ender's Game is one of my very favorite books of all time.  All of my electronic devices are named after Ender Wiggin's various compatriots and it's the only series of books that Jamie and I both own separate copies of.  To say that I've been looking forward to seeing this world realized on film would be putting it mildly, and while this adaptation certainly isn't terrible and might even be a pretty decent film on its own merits, it certainly doesn't live up to the tremendous promise of the original novel.  I almost would have preferred if the movie was an absolute trainwreck, because in a way Hood's almost-success is even more frustrating.

Pictured above is the Battle Room, a zero-G training facility where Ender and his fellow recruits play war games in order to develop teamwork and basic strategy.  The kids, all geniuses who've been pressed into military service to defend humanity from an alien threat, live on an orbiting space station called the Battle School and while their days are filled with classes and combat training, it's the battle game that really rules their lives.  They're divided into armies (think the different houses of Hogwarts) and the game's leaderboard looms over them in the communal cafeteria.  The majority of the book is spent detailing Ender Wiggin's rise through the ranks of Salamander and Rat armies, developing his own unique battle strategies that at first confound the other armies until eventually they become adopted as the norm.  Finally Ender is given command of the formerly disbanded Dragon Army and then pushed to the absolute breaking point, fighting battle after battle after battle until Ender is completely exhausted.  Eventually he's faced with a Kobayashi Maru scenario: going off only a few hours of sleep, Ender's is faced with an obstructed entrance into the Battle Room while two different enemies who've been given extra time to deploy their forces lie in wait to slaughter Ender's outmatched force.  It's the culmination of a lengthy attempt to physically and psychologically break the prepubescent general, and while Ender's response is brilliant, it's his motivation that's key: he enacts a preposterous strategy that he never expects to work in the hope that his failure will bring an end to his torment.

The Battle Room is one of those things that I've been DYING to see brought to life since the first time (of many) that I read the book.  It's an incredibly cool concept that's painted in vivid detail by Card and simply begging to live on the big screen.  The good news is that the Battle Room is presented perfectly, physically constructed exactly the way I've always imagined it.  And while the battles we see make for some great set pieces, unfortunately there are only about three of them.  It's the very best stuff in the book, but in the film it's almost fleeting.  We don't even get the courtesy of a montage showcasing a few of the book's more memorable moments.  (Bean's brilliant deadline swing is shown once with no explanation or fanfare, while "flashing the feet" is axed entirely.)  This is the fallout of one of the film's few creative changes, constricting the action to the course of about two months as opposed to a handful of years.  I'm sure the intention was to up the sense of urgency, but instead it just makes everything feel rushed.  It's seriously disappointing, even moreso because the Battle Room is so well executed that I actually wanted to to spend as much time there as possible.  The evolution of Ender's tactics from battle to battle makes for a fascinating journey and it's the kind of thing we so rarely see in modern military or action movies, which largely forego any sense of strategy in favor of more explosions.  Here it gets only the vaguest of lip service, conveying more the idea of tactical thinking rather than the actual tactics themselves.

The same problem plagues the entire movie: the Giant's Drink video game and the battle simulations at command school are two of the more memorable aspects of the original novel, and while each is brought to life with creative and effective visuals, both are blown through at breakneck speed, robbing them of any real emotional weight.  That goes double for the film's assortment of supporting roles, including Ben Kingsley's tattooed Mazer Rackham, Abigail Breslin's barely-present Valentine, and particularly Bean, Petra, Alai and the rest of Ender's jeesh.   These are all rich characters, most of whom were eventually promoted to starring roles in the various Ender sequels and spin-offs.  But here none the Battle School kids are given anything you could confuse for a defining characteristic, short of "this one's short" and "that one's got girl parts."  I was truly depressed at the treatment of Bean, a character who was cool in Ender's Game and then transitioned into an engaging hero with a fascinating identity crisis in the Ender's Shadow books.  All I wanted was a hint at Bean's true awesomeness, but instead I got a generic stand-in with about six lines of dialogue and none of Bean's trademark scrappy toughness.  I'll give them points for casting a diverse collection of child actors who actually look to represent the many countries of the world, but I have to take those points back for not using them in any kind of interesting way.  The only exception to this is Moises Arias, who's a dramatic standout as Ender's cruel commander Bonzo Madrid.  Then again, anyone who's seen Arias in Kings Of Summer won't be surprised that he shines here as well.  On the bright side, Harrison Ford actually showed up for this one.  He's awake and alert and actually seems to give a shit about the movie going on around him.  So that's nice.

There is one distinct element from the book that is almost completely whitewashed out of the film, and in a way it's both the most and the least surprising.  Along with the aforementioned shower fight, there's a scene early on in which Ender is forced to fight off a group of terrestrial classroom attackers lead by bully Stilson.  In both fights, Ender defeats his attackers thoroughly in order to ensure that there ain't gonna be no rematch.  In fact, (spoilers for the book) it's later revealed that Ender unknowingly killed both of his young tormentors.  Ender's penchant for utterly (and unwittingly) destroying his enemies is a vital component of his character.  There's no malice in Ender's actions, simply a utilitarian need to survive.  But that doesn't make his actions any less shocking, and the fact that he's recruited to lead the fleet precisely because of this dissociative killer instinct makes the whole enterprise all the more appalling.  But in the film, Stilson and Bonzo definitely survive.  Granted Stilson's gonna have a nasty scar on his face and Bonzo is probably a vegetable, but there's no arguing that they're still alive and I don't see what purpose that serves other than to soften Ender.  But softening him or any of the other kids for that matter flies in the face of what makes him such a compelling character.  Presumably Summit isn't comfortable with child-on-child murder, but considering the overwhelming success of The Hunger Games, a franchise that's built on a foundation of adolescent massacre, such a gunshy mentality seems almost prudish.

If my criticism seems harsh, it's only because I care.  The movie is fine, the kind of thing I'll happily watch on TV in eight months while writing emails or folding laundry.  In truth, this is probably an "ignorance is bliss" situation, where I'd probably have had a lot more fun with it if this was my first introduction to the character.  But as a big fan of the book, this interpretation really lacked heart and left me feeling cold.  Yeah, it's cool to see the Buggers and the Battle Room and all that stuff, but if that's all there is then who cares?  I can see that kind of stuff in any sci-fi movie.  There's nothing under the surface to really keep me invested in the story, like a fried chicken drumstick that's all extra-crispy shell but with no actual meat on the bone.

As I walked out of the theater, I realized that I didn't actually want to see and Ender's Game movie.  What I really wanted was a Game Of Thrones-style series.  I would happily spend an entire 12 episode season (maybe even two) watching Ender make his way through Battle School, followed by another season spent at Command School under the tutelage of Mazer Rackham.  Even a short run series would give the story just a little bit more breathing room and allow the characters to retain the complexities that made them so interesting on the page.  And even if you burned through the events of the first novel inside of two or three seasons, it'd be easy to transition into the Shadow series that takes place in the immediate aftermath of the Formic War.  Yeah, you'd end up losing the title character, but the military/political bent of that series would make for much better TV than the anthropological/sociological focus of the Speaker Of The Dead stuff, and that's coming from someone who likes those books more than most.  Either way, audiences would get the chance to properly experience the multi-faceted Enderverse in a way that simply doesn't feel possible (or at least likely) on the big screen.

Game Of Thrones has proven the marketability of prestige longform fantasy while Walking Dead and American Horror Story have done the same with horror.  Hard sci-fi is the next logical frontier for premium cable television.  It's a shame that Ender's Game won't be that series.



---------------------------------------
Title: Ender's Game
Director: Gavin Hood
Starring: Asa Butterfield, Harrison Ford, Hailee Steinfeld, Abigail Breslin, Ben Kingsley, Viola Davis, Moises Arias
Year Of Release: 2013
Viewing Method: Theatrical IMAX 2D - Jordan's Reading